Commenters argued that requiring complainants to file official problems only with the Title IX Coordinator-who may be a school formal with whom the complainant has no romantic relationship-will make survivors significantly less comfortable with the reporting system, when presently only about 10 % of campus sexual assaults are claimed. Other commenters wondered how a school will have to deal with a situation wherever the dad or mum, but not the child, wishes to file a formal grievance. The Department does not believe that recipients will handle complainants attempting to file a formal grievance in another way from college students who endeavor to file equivalent university paperwork for illustration, when a sort is missing a signature, recipients frequently inquire with the university student to right the paperwork. Commenters questioned what colleges must do if a mother or father afterwards disagrees with their kid's selection to file a official grievance or if the minor's guardian is not consulted prior to filing. Commenters argued that a university student who goes through the inconvenience of locating the Title IX Coordinator to make an in-man or woman report, and then afterwards decides to go after a formal process, would want to when once more go meet up with the Title IX Coordinator in-human being to file a formal grievance. Recipients are beneath an obligation under § 106.44(a) to reply immediately in a way that is not plainly unreasonable in light of the recognized situation and this obligation Start Printed Page 30136 extends to the conditions underneath which a receiver procedures a formal grievance (or a document or conversation that purports to be a official grievance).
